As America enters
into its the second week of government shutdown, economist Richard Parker
writes “How to End the Gridlock” to propose his own ideas. He utilizes an
honest although sarcastic tone to suggest a possible but improbable plan to the
people who will be affected by the government’s decisions.
To establish his
credibility Parker explains, “I’m an Oxford-trained macroeconomist, who has
taught macroeconomics policy at Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government for the
past twenty years,” immediately gaining respect from his readers. This single
sentence in the article grabs the audience’s attention explaining why they
should listen to Parker.
In the piece
Parker writes with a very honest tone that develops into a sarcastic one at the
end. He proposes an experiment to “do all the cutting in just the 80 or so
congressional districts of the most ardent Tea Party Members,” without knowing
what the outcome would be like. He continues to explain, “we develop a theory
imaginatively” allowing the audience to know that there is no concrete data
showing whether or not his theory will work. Parker’s honesty allows the
readers to fully understand his concepts to end the gridlock without false advertising
or bias. Later in the article he employs a sarcastic tone. He states, again
honestly, “As a profession, we’re still very poor at predicting results,”
contrasting the Tea Party’s claim “with inerrant certainty--
tells us what Obamacare will mean:
in a word, national bankruptcy.” He uses this mockery to juxtapose the how
different people address this situation. Parker’s honesty and sarcasm together
to propose his solution make his argument reach out to the general public. He
allows normal citizens into the discussion of America’s future by coming across
straightforward.
In a seamless
article Parker utilizes both an honest tone and a sarcastic tone to propose his
own experiment to end the government shutdown.
No comments:
Post a Comment